How to Handle Negative Feedback

on December 08, 2011

You SuckI don’t care what business you are in, or how good your product or service is, you are bound to receive negative feedback at some point. It’s impossible to make everyone happy. Impossible.

Add social media to the equation and you are really opening yourself up to feedback – both positive and negative. Remember: Many people use social media to either say something amazing about you (your product, your service, your company) or they use it to complain. I can’t tell you how many Facebook posts, Tweets, and blog posts I’ve seen directed specifically at a company, often venting about something the person did not like, how they were wronged, etc.

If you decide to make the jump and participate in social media, you have to expect that you’ll receive negative feedback at some point. You know it’s inevitable. But are you prepared? How do you handle it? How do you respond? What channel(s) do you use to communicate?

The Story: Zappos Rock ‘n’ Roll Las Vegas Marathon & 1/2 Marathon

On Sunday, I was joined by 44,000 other runners on the strip for the Zappos Rock ‘n’ Roll Las Vegas Marathon & 1/2 Marathon. It was an incredible event. Imagine: 44 thousand people running down the streets of Las Vegas – at night – with local bands playing every mile or so. One of the guys from Pearl Jam did the national anthem … as a guitar solo. It was wild.

When I got home Monday night, I was still on a bit of a runner’s high. Sore, but feeling good mentally. I decided to pop over to the Rock ‘n’ Roll Las Vegas Marathon & 1/2 Marathon Facebook page. This is what I saw (Note: If you want to see all comments, you may have to “like” their page first):
Rock 'n' Roll Las Vegas Marathon & 1_2 Marathon Facebook Post
As you can see, the folks running this page took the lead by posting a congratulations to all runners. They acknowledged that there were some issues and then asked for feedback. They asked. People replied. In fact, as I write this, this post was liked 365 times, shared 18, and there were nearly 400 comments. The first comment, “I’m in next year” was one of the few positive ones. The far majority read something like the second one, from Charlene:

APOLOGIZE FOR THE INCONVENIENCE!!!!! What a callus and inappropriate comment to those who paid you money to ensure our safety. I hope your next year’s FAILS. Go ahead, delete my comment, too.

Yikes, right?

How They Responded

Here is what was interesting. They chose not to respond on that thread. Unless I missed it, they never once directly (publicly) acknowledged any of the runner feedback – not the positive feedback, not the negative feedback. My guess is they were a bit overwhelmed by the sheer volume. However, this is not an excuse. If you are going to ask for feedback, be prepared to reply. Did they have to acknowledge every single comment? Maybe not, but at least a few of them. Personally, I would have taken the time to reply to all.

Instead, they chose another route.

On Tuesday and Wednesday, they added the following 4 updates on their Facebook page:
Rock 'n' Roll Las Vegas Marathon & 1_2 Marathon Facebook Post (2)

Rock 'n' Roll Las Vegas Marathon & 1_2 Marathon Facebook Post (3)

A few things to note here:

  1. These posts generated a ton more likes, shares, and comments. Still, no replies from the Marathon folks.
  2. Runners continued to complain, though it seemed as though the balance of negative to positive comments was shifting to the positive – slightly.
  3. Runners used this as an opportunity to drop in links to other, non-Facebook, commentary about the race – like this one.

Their Response in Other Channels

While I cannot comment on all channels that they used to reply, I can tell you that I received a few follow-up emails from the folks at the Rock ‘n’ Roll Las Vegas Marathon & 1/2 Marathon. The first was this email (below):
Rock & Roll Marathon Email - Participant Feedback Wanted
The subject line read, “Participant Feedback Wanted” and included a short explanation of some of the issues they identified as well as a link to the survey. They also added a $10 incentive to complete the survey. To their credit, they were certainly trying. Again, asking for feedback – in many ways – shows that they care and want to improve.

The day after, I received this email:
Congrats Rock 'n' Rollers! Email
The subject line read “Congrats Rock ‘n’ Rollers!” and lead with an apology note from the CEO of Competitor Group. That same apology letter appears on their Facebook page as a tab. See below:
Rock 'n' Roll Las Vegas Marathon & 1_2 Marathon Apology on Facebook page

A Recap & Some Suggestions

If you’ve made it this far, my guess is that you have an opinion on how this was all handled. I do too. Overall, I think they did a nice job being proactive. They…

  1. Posted to Facebook soliciting feedback
  2. Sent an email that included a link to a survey
  3. Sent another email with an apology from the CEO
  4. Added a tab to their Facebook page with that same apology
  5. Posted a few more times to their Facebook page with explanations, apologies, acknowledgements

However, I still feel strongly that if they are going to open up the door for feedback on their Facebook page, they need to reply to the comments – both the positive and negative ones. As you can see from that page, they have over 25,000 likes. My bet is that over 90% of those who liked this page are those who ran in the race. If you are going to start a conversation on Facebook, continue it there. That’s not to say that you can’t communicate via other channels. I loved that they sent an email asking for feedback as not everyone would have seen the posts on Facebook. Just because they have 25k likes does not mean that everyone is reading their updates. Email, on the other hand, will at least land in everyone’s inbox. Sure, they can delete it, but they are more likely to at least see it.

One suggestion – that would take time, effort and money – but could have a huge impact: Pull a list of all runners who left comments on their Facebook wall. Match them to their email address and/or postal address and send them a personal note. Apologize. Ask for feedback. Acknowledge that they messed up. Suggest ways they will improve for next time. Create another forum (maybe even a closed Facebook Group) where the most vocal can continue the conversation. Actively participate in that discussion. Use this an an opportunity to turn the haters into fans. It’s possible, but it takes work.

I’m curious what you all think. What did you like about how this was handled? What would you have done differently? Has this ever happened at your company? If so, how did you respond?

Cheers.
DJ Waldow

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
LauLau81 131 pts

This is very inspirational and I think a lot of people should know this...

My latest conversation: Geneva Airport Transfers

SuzanneVara 7 pts

DJ

It is very unfortunate that this race has been met with so much negativity. 44,000 people is nothing to sneeze at. In the past it was such a fun and celebrated event. Anyway, I can see why they wanted to move the conversation off FB. Everyone wants to bring the convo to their comfortable site where they can monitor and maybe better said, control? However, we know that you go where the people are and the people are on FB.

I did find it interesting that in addressing the problem, they talked about themselves and how they had friends and family in the race. Is this supposed to make people feel better? People are wanting their problem addressed and not told that hey, we dropped the ball on the people we really care about so it is not just you. Seems to me that would fuel more negativity.

So, how did you do? Would you go back again for it?

djwaldow 33 pts moderator

I noticed that too SuzanneVara , about them mentioned family & friends in the race. I took that as their attempt to "humanize" the issue a bit.

How did I do? Started off strong and finished weak. Ha! However, I was in corral #2 so I think I missed most of the "excitement."

Thanks for reading (& your comments), as always.

Pollack7 5 pts

A couple of thoughts on this:

1. Addressing the issues of the commenters in a new post is likely going to reach more people than replying as a comment to their original post. At 400+ comments, they would just be adding to the noise. If not all 25k likes are following their updates, then even fewer are going to read through post comments for further responses.

2. At the volume of feedback they were receiving, a "summary" reply is more practical than individual replies, as the same issues are likely brought up repeatedly. How many times do they need to repeat "we're sorry it was crowded"?

3. Do all comments deserve a response? Charlene's comment you quoted above is just ranting. Sure, they could come back with "Charlene, we're very sorry you feel that way!" and I can see the argument there, but personally I'd stick to addressing the legitimate concerns.

BTW, the Las Vegas Review-Journal article was pretty frightening. In the dozens of races I've run I have never given a second thought to the source of the water.

djwaldow 33 pts moderator

Thanks for your comments, as always, Pollack7 . You make some great points. My "counter."

1. Very true. I thought it was smart to start new posts; however, as mentioned, the more posts they created the more they "reopened the conversation." I still think that addressing individuals - while time consuming - is important. Otherwise, it's like a typical blanket "corporate" response.

2. I think they need to repeat "I'm sorry" as many times as they have to. You can never say sorry too much.

3. But here's the rub, to Charlene, that may have been a legitimate concern. Who are they to say what is legit and what is a rant. Playing devil's advocate on this one. I mostly agree with you.

Yeah ... water source stuff was a bit scary...

Thanks again Matt!

Conversation from Twitter

projmgr
projmgr

thatjeffsmith Yeah I read that the other day. It was very good. If you search on #RnRLV you can see tons of blogs, etc.

thatjeffsmith
thatjeffsmith

projmgr a shame to have such a large turnout be wasted or turn into a negative

projmgr
projmgr

thatjeffsmith Agreed. I heard they wanted to go for more than 60k to be world's largest next year. Hope they are rethinking that.

djwaldow
djwaldow

shannonholato trendlinei Thanks dude!